Last week when Gore Vidal said a bunch of stupid things about Barack Obama, I left him alone. He's old and prone to saying anything that will get his name in print. Remember, he was completely inconsistent during the primaries, flip-flopping between Obama and Clinton. He said things that many people observed were racist. Everyone left him alone.
Today in The Atlantic, Vidal said he never should have supported Obama and "experience mattered." He then went on to suggest that the 13-year-old girl Roman Polanski had sex with was a "young hooker" and that Roman was only persecuted out of anti-Semitism.
Why does this guy still get interviewed? Can't someone stop him from embarrassing himself? Doesn't someone have power of attorney? Isn't there anyone concerned with this guy's vanishing legacy?
What's even worse is that since Sept. 11, 2001, Vidal has been a leading "intellectual" of the 9/11 Truth movement, giving countless interviews to lunatic fringe correspondents like Alex Jones. He'll tell anyone who will listen about how George Bush personally planned 9/11. Seriously, Google has 140,000 pages on Vidal's paranoia.
So please, legit reporters -- stop asking this demented man questions. It's over.
Originally posted on The Hill.
Showing posts with label Hillary Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary Clinton. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Clinton Doubts God Paints Pictures On Earth
Hillary Clinton got herself in some trouble last Thursday when she was in Mexico, while visiting the Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe.
Catholics believe: "The image of Our Lady of Guadalupe was miraculously imprinted by Mary on the tilma, or cloak, of St. Juan Diego in 1531."
Clinton asked Msgr. Diego Monroy, the rector of the Basilica, "Who painted it?" He replied "God!" I wish I could have been there to see the look on her face!
Labels:
catholicism,
christianity,
Hillary Clinton,
Religion
Monday, February 23, 2009
Late Night Odds & Ends
We just finished staging Vote! today. The last song to stage was the act 1 closer, "I Sell You What," and that went fairly quickly. With the extra time, I was able to run the first 27 pages. Tomorrow we'll stumble through act one, fixing any issues that come up.
-- George Clooney has ruled out running for office in the past, "No. I've slept with too many women, I've done too many drugs, and I've been to too many parties." But, he sure looks like a candidate meeting with Barak Obama and Joe Biden about Darfar.
Clooney spoke to the press outside the White House: “They said that they would appoint a full time high profile envoy that would report directly to the president... It's good to hear because there was some concern that this could fall off the radar. . .This would be a huge policy step." Clooney's right, it's good news. The UN has estimated over 400,000 have died in Darfar, nearly the number of Americans who died in World War 2.
-- NY Times says America loves their Obamas, the President's approval is 63%. Michelle is the most popular new First Lady in 28 years, at 49%. At this point, H. Clinton had a 44% approval rating... Just saying.
-- Arnold Schwarzenegger needs to be on Obama's Cabinet. How about replacing Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense. How fucking awesome would that be?
-- Obama just paid for $10 billion dollars in new Science funding.
-- A middle ground on gay marriage? Federal civil unions make a lot of sense.
-- Even Jesus isn't paying the bills anymore. Billy Graham lays off 10% of his workforce.
-- Former Father Charles O'Byrne, Gov. Paterson's former aid who didn't pay his taxes, isn't looking to return to Albany.
-- George Clooney has ruled out running for office in the past, "No. I've slept with too many women, I've done too many drugs, and I've been to too many parties." But, he sure looks like a candidate meeting with Barak Obama and Joe Biden about Darfar.
Clooney spoke to the press outside the White House: “They said that they would appoint a full time high profile envoy that would report directly to the president... It's good to hear because there was some concern that this could fall off the radar. . .This would be a huge policy step." Clooney's right, it's good news. The UN has estimated over 400,000 have died in Darfar, nearly the number of Americans who died in World War 2.-- NY Times says America loves their Obamas, the President's approval is 63%. Michelle is the most popular new First Lady in 28 years, at 49%. At this point, H. Clinton had a 44% approval rating... Just saying.
-- Arnold Schwarzenegger needs to be on Obama's Cabinet. How about replacing Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense. How fucking awesome would that be?
-- Obama just paid for $10 billion dollars in new Science funding.
-- A middle ground on gay marriage? Federal civil unions make a lot of sense.
-- Even Jesus isn't paying the bills anymore. Billy Graham lays off 10% of his workforce.
-- Former Father Charles O'Byrne, Gov. Paterson's former aid who didn't pay his taxes, isn't looking to return to Albany.
Labels:
Charles O'Byrne,
civil unions,
darfar,
David Paterson,
george clooney,
Hillary Clinton,
joe biden,
politics,
polls,
rehearsal,
vote
Monday, February 16, 2009
President's Day

Lincoln is my favorite U.S. President. I'm a total cliche.
Last year when I read that Obama's favorite book was Doris Kearns Goodwin's Team of Rivals, I read it right away. I was the only person reading it on last summer's Rosie Family Cruise. It's a terrific book, detailing Lincoln's life and focusing on his experiences with his cabinet.
The book inspired me so much on the whole Team of Rivals idea, that I argued on Queerty that Obama should choose Clinton as his VP. Thankfully he didn't listen to me, because I'm quite a fan of Joe Biden.
I'm excited for The History Channel's Stealing Lincolns Body, tonight at 9PM EST.
Today is George Washington's Birthday. I've read David McCullough's 1776, but not a full biography on Washington - so I just ordered His Excellency by Joseph Ellis. Until that comes in, watch this three minute YouTube Video on Washington that truly made me LOL.
Friday, January 23, 2009
The Hill: Gillibrand: An Elephant in Donkey’s Clothing
My latest from The Hill:
Gov. David Paterson (D) has shocked progressive New York today with his pick of Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) to replace Hillary Clinton in the U.S. Senate.
Gillibrand's conservative credentials may have been neatly scrubbed off Wikipedia (more than 50 edits in the last 24 hours), but they won't remain hidden. She has called her own record "one of the most conservative in the state," and has voted for such right-wing legislation as the repeal of the D.C. semiautomatic weapon ban. Her positions on immigration, gay marriage and the Iraq war are all questionable. And that's just to name a few.
Gillibrand may represent her conservative district fairly, but she has no place holding statewide office in a state like New York, which voted 62 percent for Obama. Paterson has guaranteed a contested Senate primary in 2010 and is continually opening himself up for a primary challenge.
Labels:
David Paterson,
Hillary Clinton,
Kirsten Gillibrand,
politics,
The Hill
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
My Funny ’Conservative’ Friend
My funny GOP friend Jammy and I were chatting on AIM.
Anyone think he's wrong? I don't.
rjdavismd2 (1:44:37 PM): you're a registered republican right?
burgwithonions (1:44:52 PM): yes I am
rjdavismd2 (1:45:21 PM): who would you vote for
burgwithonions (1:45:56 PM): at first I was going to register as independent but I wouldn't be able to vote
burgwithonions (1:45:59 PM): Ron Paul of course
rjdavismd2 (1:46:09 PM): oh fun
rjdavismd2 (1:46:10 PM): you should vote
burgwithonions (1:47:38 PM): yeah, I like him. A lot better than the other republicans
burgwithonions (1:47:42 PM): I wish he would get more attention
rjdavismd2 (1:47:52 PM): he's my favorite racist candidate for sure
burgwithonions (1:49:21 PM): hah, well I think Hillary is my favorite racist candidate, if only she was republican
rjdavismd2 (1:50:11 PM): She's run a more racist campaign than anyone but Mike Huckabee.
burgwithonions (1:52:20 PM): Mike Huckabee is the worst, but she's just as bad.
Anyone think he's wrong? I don't.
Thursday, January 3, 2008
I'm For Obama (My Huffington Post Endorsement)
We Can Begin Change Now
A Featured Article on The Huffington Post
A Featured Article on The Huffington Post
For me this election is about change. Changing our party, changing Washington, changing the nation, and ultimately changing the world. I was only six years old when George Bush Sr. was elected president and ten when Clinton followed. They are the political families that I was always conscious of and are the personification of the gridlocked political system.
We can move beyond that system beginning January 3rd, in Iowa, and then spreading across this country as the people nominate Barack Obama for President.
As much as the names of decades past represent the DC gridlock and in some cases the shamefully-centric Democratic Leadership Council, Obama represents a vital, legitimate step forward. He plans to unite the country to reinvigorate our tired political process. We get the best of both worlds here, jump starting America to move toward progress together while allowing us to be proud to be Democrats again.
This party -- the party of Jefferson and Jackson, of Roosevelt and Kennedy -- has always made the biggest difference in the lives of the American people when we led, not by polls, but by principle; not by calculation, but by conviction; when we summoned the entire nation to a common purpose -- a higher purpose. And I run for the Presidency of the United States of America because that's the party America needs us to be right now. - Barack Obama
In December, Andrew Sullivan wrote a beautiful feature on Obama for The Atlantic Monthly, entitled "Goodbye to All That." In it he argues passionately for the transformational possibilities of an Obama Presidency that will even move to heal our generational scars. "We may in fact have finally found that bridge to the 21st century that Bill Clinton told us about. Its name is Obama," he closes.
What's exciting is you can see what Sullivan is saying everywhere. Obama supporters at rallies don't all "look like Facebook" as some campaigns want you to believe. In fact, the latest Des Moines Register poll shows Obama with huge support from men and woman, all age groups, income levels, rural and city voters, and union members. His spectrum is so large that it includes nearly 40% of independents and 5% of Republicans. This isn't just a campaign, it's a movement.
He has supporters from my mother, Judy, a public school special-ed teacher in Maryland, to Taus, a Danish doctor friend of mine, who wrote me today, "The world needs a man like him." The supporters I'm with each day here in Peterborough, New Hampshire are wonderful, passionate, and creative people - even entire families - who don't fit into any particular mold. One potential voter, that I spoke with today, was a retired police chief from a small town who told me, "Obama is what America needs right now." He was introduced to Obama by his college aged daughter and it's actually strengthening their relationship.
Obama is loved by many daughters and sons, all over the country, who are converting their parents to Obama. (I'm one of those sons.) The Des Moines Register poll shows Obama has an astonishing 56% of voters under age thirty-four. He's woken up my cynical generation and made them believe in being Americans again. It's brought out a patriotism that nearly eight years of Bush had stripped away. When Clinton's campaign mocked Obama's young supporters, I was offended at the message these career politicians were sending to young people who were getting involved for the first time; "Go away, we don't think you even count."
Obama embraced his young supporters and gave them a campaign based on hope and change, not on fear, like Clinton, or on anger, like Edwards. The truly stunning thing about Obama's candidacy is that it's actually positive. When he tells us that, "Your voice can change the world." I think he actually believes it. Hell, he makes me almost believe it.
Other people absolutely believe him too. While Clinton raised a ton of money from the establishment, even leading the Republican candidates in donations from pharmaceutical companies and the defense industry, Obama looked to regular Americans to build his populist campaign. With nearly 500,000 contributers, 90% of his donations have been under $100. He doesn't accept lobbyist money, while Clinton famously said at the YearlyKos Convention, "A lot of those lobbyists, whether you like it or not, represent real Americans, they actually do." Obama's built the grassroots support to win a general election with a real mandate to pursue change, he hasn't catered to Washington for his shot at victory.
Although much has been said about Obama's opposition, from the start, to the war in Iraq, he deserves more credit for showing such foresight. Clinton and Edwards both voted for the war, without even bothering to fully read their intelligence reports. To their credit, both Obama and Edwards opposed the Kyl/Lieberman Amendment, which Bush could use to justify a war with Iran. Clinton incredibly and unbelievably voted for the resolution. It showed, yet again, that her foreign policy votes are either: a) politically motivated or b) super scary. Stephen Elliot correctly noted last week on Clinton's Iraq Vote; "We're not talking about any mistake, we're talking about the great mistake of our time. She might as well have voted to authorize the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand." It's fair to worry over Clinton's foreign policy judgment and to give Obama due credit for his.
Clinton's experience argument has been largely dismissed by the press, The New York Times' Patrick Healy wrote last week that "during those two terms in the White House, Mrs. Clinton did not hold a security clearance. She did not attend National Security Council meetings. She was not given a copy of the president's daily intelligence briefing. She did not assert herself on the crises in Somalia, Haiti and Rwanda." Obama's experience outside of Washington should be seen as positive to voters. His work as a community organizer, civil rights lawyer, constitutional scholar, Illinois State Senator, and US Senator give him a wide and varied pragmatic background.
You may still believe I'm a crazy idealist for believing Washington can change. You may think that my judgment is lacking because I supported McCain in 2000 and Dean in 2004 in the Primaries. But, I came to support them out of my anger toward the establishment. I wanted someone to go down to DC and knock some heads around, even if I didn't think they'd have been able to actually get much done. But my endorsement of Obama isn't a choice made in anger or fear, it's a choice made by my belief that Obama is a candidate who can actually transform Washington, not just push it around during recess. I'm more optimistic than I've been in a long time and totally fired up.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
